<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Redactor&#8217;s Dilemma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/12/08/the-redactors-dilemma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/12/08/the-redactors-dilemma/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:48:39 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: m65</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/12/08/the-redactors-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-10670</link>
		<dc:creator>m65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3847#comment-10670</guid>
		<description>good read thanks for the share. i really like the way the article is written and also the design of the website</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good read thanks for the share. i really like the way the article is written and also the design of the website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas2</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/12/08/the-redactors-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-10272</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3847#comment-10272</guid>
		<description>Perhaps they should declare death to all modifiers on one day, remove  every adverb and every adjective the next. Then for another document they can have a war on articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they should declare death to all modifiers on one day, remove  every adverb and every adjective the next. Then for another document they can have a war on articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belligerati</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/12/08/the-redactors-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-10268</link>
		<dc:creator>Belligerati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3847#comment-10268</guid>
		<description>[...] Sanchez in The Redactor’s Dilemma make an interesting point about redacting information that I hadn&#8217;t considered, that how you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sanchez in The Redactor’s Dilemma make an interesting point about redacting information that I hadn&#8217;t considered, that how you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Redactor’s Dilemma &#124; Liberal Whoppers</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/12/08/the-redactors-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-10265</link>
		<dc:creator>The Redactor’s Dilemma &#124; Liberal Whoppers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3847#comment-10265</guid>
		<description>[...] Sanchez recently offered up this very interesting post on ways to figure out what the redacted parts of released government documents may say — at least [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sanchez recently offered up this very interesting post on ways to figure out what the redacted parts of released government documents may say — at least [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TruePath</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/12/08/the-redactors-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-10263</link>
		<dc:creator>TruePath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3847#comment-10263</guid>
		<description>Your comment about the handoffs narrowing the region doesn&#039;t really make sense.

After all the handoff is made based on the signal strength at the various cell sites, exactly what you already have access to, so a handoff shouldn&#039;t help to locate the cellular device any better than the signal strength info.

---

Now true the agencies can&#039;t actually have someone randomly cut out extra passages to stymie this kind of analysis but they can do something which might be even more effective.  Let total morons without real power or operational knowledge do the redaction so you have no idea if this is a significant redaction or simply something redacted because the redactor was confused or covering their ass on a subject they didn&#039;t understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment about the handoffs narrowing the region doesn&#8217;t really make sense.</p>
<p>After all the handoff is made based on the signal strength at the various cell sites, exactly what you already have access to, so a handoff shouldn&#8217;t help to locate the cellular device any better than the signal strength info.</p>
<p>&#8212;</p>
<p>Now true the agencies can&#8217;t actually have someone randomly cut out extra passages to stymie this kind of analysis but they can do something which might be even more effective.  Let total morons without real power or operational knowledge do the redaction so you have no idea if this is a significant redaction or simply something redacted because the redactor was confused or covering their ass on a subject they didn&#8217;t understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Redactor’s Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/12/08/the-redactors-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-10259</link>
		<dc:creator>The Volokh Conspiracy &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Redactor’s Dilemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3847#comment-10259</guid>
		<description>[...] Sanchez recently offered up this very interesting post on ways to figure out what the redacted version of released government documents may say — at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sanchez recently offered up this very interesting post on ways to figure out what the redacted version of released government documents may say — at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 11/12/2009: French Military on Thunderbird &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/12/08/the-redactors-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-10073</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 11/12/2009: French Military on Thunderbird &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3847#comment-10073</guid>
		<description>[...] The Redactor’s Dilemma What sort of jackass (I fumed) had concluded that the contents of American public laws were some kind of operational secret? But of course, once I got over my pique at this obnoxious excess of secrecy, I started thinking: Why, exactly were they worried about someone reading that? I had, perversely, just gained a bit of new information. Not the statutory definition—that was already sitting on my desk in yet another pile—but the fact that the investigative technique they’re taking pains to conceal (that’s what “b7e” means, it’s the code for the FOIA exemption they’re invoking) involved exploiting that part of the statute in some crucial way. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Redactor’s Dilemma What sort of jackass (I fumed) had concluded that the contents of American public laws were some kind of operational secret? But of course, once I got over my pique at this obnoxious excess of secrecy, I started thinking: Why, exactly were they worried about someone reading that? I had, perversely, just gained a bit of new information. Not the statutory definition—that was already sitting on my desk in yet another pile—but the fact that the investigative technique they’re taking pains to conceal (that’s what “b7e” means, it’s the code for the FOIA exemption they’re invoking) involved exploiting that part of the statute in some crucial way. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interpreting, accurately, what isn&#8217;t there &#8212; the Redactor&#8217;s Dilemma</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/12/08/the-redactors-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-10066</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interpreting, accurately, what isn&#8217;t there &#8212; the Redactor&#8217;s Dilemma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3847#comment-10066</guid>
		<description>[...] as telling as what we typically think of as &#8220;facts.&#8221; Julian Sanchez, in a post entitled The Redactor&#8217;s Dilemma, gives a brilliant demonstration of this truth. Sanchez has been &#8220;poring over the FOIA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as telling as what we typically think of as &#8220;facts.&#8221; Julian Sanchez, in a post entitled The Redactor&#8217;s Dilemma, gives a brilliant demonstration of this truth. Sanchez has been &#8220;poring over the FOIA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Wintersmith</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/12/08/the-redactors-dilemma/comment-page-1/#comment-10015</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Wintersmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3847#comment-10015</guid>
		<description>If I were a redactor, after I had cut out  everything in a document I thought needed to remain secret, I&#039;d make a second pass to redact a bunch of random passages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were a redactor, after I had cut out  everything in a document I thought needed to remain secret, I&#8217;d make a second pass to redact a bunch of random passages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
