Comments on: More Than You Ever Wanted to Know About Roving Wiretaps

By: Random Precision

Random Precision — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:41:37 +0000

Well I guess one of us is confused … but which one?

I’m afraid that the National-Security-Police-State Axis has gotten to your kool-aid. Pretty soon, you will have forgotten what the argument was about.

But that’s okay, the argument was over a long time ago … all that’s left now is the charade.

By: Julian Sanchez

Julian Sanchez — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:49:04 +0000

Yeah, the Fourth Amendment is actually really f*ing complicated. I say this as someone who’s almost certainly on the same side as RP here.

By: Greg N.

Greg N. — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 03:16:15 +0000

Look again, Random.

By: Random Precision

Random Precision — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:04:35 +0000

Last time I looked, the Fourth Admendment didn’t seem that complicated.

But, I suppose when you want to obscure the fact that you’re ignoring the Fourth Amendment, it helps to make things complicated …

By: Julian Sanchez

Julian Sanchez — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:08:50 +0000

As they say on Facebook… “it’s complicated”

By: Jacob Wintersmith

Jacob Wintersmith — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:53:28 +0000

So… are roving wiretaps Good or Bad?