<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Weak Man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: モンクレール</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/comment-page-1/#comment-18269</link>
		<dc:creator>モンクレール</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3372#comment-18269</guid>
		<description>at the truth. Edunihilism is a strawman, or at best, a very rarely encountered</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at the truth. Edunihilism is a strawman, or at best, a very rarely encountered</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ゴヤール</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/comment-page-1/#comment-18091</link>
		<dc:creator>ゴヤール</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3372#comment-18091</guid>
		<description>s no conspiracy!” and “in whose interest would be a conspiracy?“. Julian Sanchez refers to this as the “weak man” argument. It’s lazy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s no conspiracy!” and “in whose interest would be a conspiracy?“. Julian Sanchez refers to this as the “weak man” argument. It’s lazy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balloon Juice &#187; in search of concrete teaching statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/comment-page-1/#comment-14906</link>
		<dc:creator>Balloon Juice &#187; in search of concrete teaching statistics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 09:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3372#comment-14906</guid>
		<description>[...] is no way to get at the truth. Edunihilism is a strawman, or at best, a very rarely encountered weak man. And, incidentally, I&#8217;m not even sure his conclusions proceed logically from his premise. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is no way to get at the truth. Edunihilism is a strawman, or at best, a very rarely encountered weak man. And, incidentally, I&#8217;m not even sure his conclusions proceed logically from his premise. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weak Man Argument &#124; anotherpanacea</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/comment-page-1/#comment-10749</link>
		<dc:creator>The Weak Man Argument &#124; anotherpanacea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3372#comment-10749</guid>
		<description>[...] read. In it, Talisse and Aikin propose a variant of the &#8220;Straw Man fallacy,&#8221; the &#8220;Weak Man.&#8221; The Weak Man fallacy doesn&#8217;t misstate a rival&#8217;s position like a &#8217;straw [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read. In it, Talisse and Aikin propose a variant of the &#8220;Straw Man fallacy,&#8221; the &#8220;Weak Man.&#8221; The Weak Man fallacy doesn&#8217;t misstate a rival&#8217;s position like a &#8217;straw [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Två saker &#124; Sänd mina rötter regn</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/comment-page-1/#comment-10001</link>
		<dc:creator>Två saker &#124; Sänd mina rötter regn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3372#comment-10001</guid>
		<description>[...] det scenario som är det mest pessimistiska. Så personligen tycker jag att det är något av ett weak man-argument. I vilken fall som helst så har Manicore en poäng i sin kommentar att det nog är [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] det scenario som är det mest pessimistiska. Så personligen tycker jag att det är något av ett weak man-argument. I vilken fall som helst så har Manicore en poäng i sin kommentar att det nog är [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The 12 days of global warming - E.D. Kain - American Tory - True/Slant</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/comment-page-1/#comment-9896</link>
		<dc:creator>The 12 days of global warming - E.D. Kain - American Tory - True/Slant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3372#comment-9896</guid>
		<description>[...] there’s no conspiracy!” and “in whose interest would be a conspiracy?“. Julian Sanchez refers to this as the “weak man” argument. It’s lazy, intellectually dishonest, and doesn’t convince anyone who doesn’t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there’s no conspiracy!” and “in whose interest would be a conspiracy?“. Julian Sanchez refers to this as the “weak man” argument. It’s lazy, intellectually dishonest, and doesn’t convince anyone who doesn’t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: If we add ONE more strawman to this pile, we&#8217;ll be in serious danger of a brushfire &#187; Postmodern Conservative &#124; A First Things Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/comment-page-1/#comment-9876</link>
		<dc:creator>If we add ONE more strawman to this pile, we&#8217;ll be in serious danger of a brushfire &#187; Postmodern Conservative &#124; A First Things Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3372#comment-9876</guid>
		<description>[...] no conspiracy!&#8221; and &#8220;in whose interest would be a conspiracy?&#8220;. Julian Sanchez refers to this as the &#8220;weak man&#8221; argument. It&#8217;s lazy, intellectually dishonest, and doesn&#8217;t convince anyone who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] no conspiracy!&#8221; and &#8220;in whose interest would be a conspiracy?&#8220;. Julian Sanchez refers to this as the &#8220;weak man&#8221; argument. It&#8217;s lazy, intellectually dishonest, and doesn&#8217;t convince anyone who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 06-Sep-2009 &#124; MohanArun.com</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/comment-page-1/#comment-9286</link>
		<dc:creator>06-Sep-2009 &#124; MohanArun.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 16:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3372#comment-9286</guid>
		<description>[...] The Weak Man Argument or Getting Duped: How the Media Messes with Your Mind. A variant of the &#8216;Straw Man fallacy,&#8217; the &#8216;weak man&#8217; doesn&#8217;t misstate a rival&#8217;s position like a &#8217;straw man,&#8217; but instead chooses &#8220;the opposition’s weakest (or one of its weakest) arguments or proponents for attack.&#8221; Originally proposed by Robert Talisse and Scott Aikin here. (pdf) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Weak Man Argument or Getting Duped: How the Media Messes with Your Mind. A variant of the &#8216;Straw Man fallacy,&#8217; the &#8216;weak man&#8217; doesn&#8217;t misstate a rival&#8217;s position like a &#8217;straw man,&#8217; but instead chooses &#8220;the opposition’s weakest (or one of its weakest) arguments or proponents for attack.&#8221; Originally proposed by Robert Talisse and Scott Aikin here. (pdf) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sotomayor Freakout &#171; Wintry Smile</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/comment-page-1/#comment-8417</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sotomayor Freakout &#171; Wintry Smile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3372#comment-8417</guid>
		<description>[...] entering office has been shoddy at best.  Perhaps what we have is a negative consequence of the weak man argument that Julian &#8220;logical fallacies&#8221; Sanchez alerted us to. Possibly related posts: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] entering office has been shoddy at best.  Perhaps what we have is a negative consequence of the weak man argument that Julian &#8220;logical fallacies&#8221; Sanchez alerted us to. Possibly related posts: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sotomayor Rorschach &#171; Wintry Smile</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/the-weak-man/comment-page-1/#comment-8416</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sotomayor Rorschach &#171; Wintry Smile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 01:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3372#comment-8416</guid>
		<description>[...] entering office has been shoddy at best.  Perhaps what we have is a negative consequence of the weak man argument that Julian &#8220;logical fallacies&#8221; Sanchez alerted us to. Possibly related posts: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] entering office has been shoddy at best.  Perhaps what we have is a negative consequence of the weak man argument that Julian &#8220;logical fallacies&#8221; Sanchez alerted us to. Possibly related posts: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

