<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hot News and the War on Paraphrase</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/hot-news-and-the-war-on-paraphrase/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/hot-news-and-the-war-on-paraphrase/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/hot-news-and-the-war-on-paraphrase/comment-page-1/#comment-8261</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3369#comment-8261</guid>
		<description>Eh.  Blogger sells ads, revenue is based on traffic, traffic is based on having breaking news quickly, blogger with lots of breaking news acts as a substitute for the local paper (or its website)... not that I want to see this doctrine expanded, but it doesn&#039;t seem like a huge stretch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh.  Blogger sells ads, revenue is based on traffic, traffic is based on having breaking news quickly, blogger with lots of breaking news acts as a substitute for the local paper (or its website)&#8230; not that I want to see this doctrine expanded, but it doesn&#8217;t seem like a huge stretch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: southpaw</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/07/01/hot-news-and-the-war-on-paraphrase/comment-page-1/#comment-8260</link>
		<dc:creator>southpaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 03:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3369#comment-8260</guid>
		<description>I believe one of the elements of a &quot;hot news&quot; infringement claim, as it survives today, is the plaintiff&#039;s showing that the defendant&#039;s use of the &quot;misappropriated&quot; information is in direct competition with a product or service offered by the plaintiff (i.e. a rival news wire can&#039;t leach off the substance of the AP&#039;s hot news stories, but a stock broker is free to profit from them).  I imagine it would be a stretch to say that most online outlets are in direct competition with newsgathers (though some certainly are).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe one of the elements of a &#8220;hot news&#8221; infringement claim, as it survives today, is the plaintiff&#8217;s showing that the defendant&#8217;s use of the &#8220;misappropriated&#8221; information is in direct competition with a product or service offered by the plaintiff (i.e. a rival news wire can&#8217;t leach off the substance of the AP&#8217;s hot news stories, but a stock broker is free to profit from them).  I imagine it would be a stretch to say that most online outlets are in direct competition with newsgathers (though some certainly are).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

