<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fox Article Likely Filled With Gibberish, Experts Say</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/22/fox-article-likely-filled-with-gibberish-experts-say/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/22/fox-article-likely-filled-with-gibberish-experts-say/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Every Time I Say “Terrorism,” the Patriot Act Gets More Awesome &#124; Think Tank West</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/22/fox-article-likely-filled-with-gibberish-experts-say/comment-page-1/#comment-10766</link>
		<dc:creator>Every Time I Say “Terrorism,” the Patriot Act Gets More Awesome &#124; Think Tank West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3199#comment-10766</guid>
		<description>[...] about the Patriot Act, then tries to explain how the law expanded surveillance powers, but mostly botches the basic facts.  From what we know thanks to the work of real reporters,  the initial tip and the key evidence [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about the Patriot Act, then tries to explain how the law expanded surveillance powers, but mostly botches the basic facts.  From what we know thanks to the work of real reporters,  the initial tip and the key evidence [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/22/fox-article-likely-filled-with-gibberish-experts-say/comment-page-1/#comment-7700</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3199#comment-7700</guid>
		<description>Good for you, Julian.  And a fine title.   What&#039;s sad is Corbin&#039;s piece not only won&#039;t be pulled by FOX, it probably would have stayed up at the Washington Post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good for you, Julian.  And a fine title.   What&#8217;s sad is Corbin&#8217;s piece not only won&#8217;t be pulled by FOX, it probably would have stayed up at the Washington Post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevelaudig</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/22/fox-article-likely-filled-with-gibberish-experts-say/comment-page-1/#comment-7696</link>
		<dc:creator>stevelaudig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3199#comment-7696</guid>
		<description>It might have been Andrew Jackson who first said &quot;it doesn&#039;t even make good non-sense&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might have been Andrew Jackson who first said &#8220;it doesn&#8217;t even make good non-sense&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

