<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sour Grapes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/comment-page-1/#comment-8548</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3184#comment-8548</guid>
		<description>I think the vegetarian cultural issue is really more about two things:

1) The implication inherent in veganism of being judgmental. I think it is wrong to eat animals, therefore you are being wrong when you eat animals every day as a core part of your culture and lifestyle. Sometimes this view of conflict is defensiveness on the part of the omnivore, sometimes it is proselytizing on the part of the vegan, but a basic conflict often develops.

2) The social inconvenience. I know when I invite people over I normally cook a roast or grill hamburgers. If there is a known vegetarian on the guest list I will need to add something else to the menu, and as a good host I would like it to still be something tasty. Since I don&#039;t eat anything vegetarian that one could consider a main course, this will require some research, experimentation, and extra work. I understand this is as much of a hassle for the vegan as it is for someone hosting, but overall the inconvenience can still grate.

Personally I have examined the moral issue in depth and decided on something approximately summarized as&quot;my ancestors didn&#039;t claw their way to the top of the food chain so I could defer to a chicken&#039;s feelings when it comes to my food.&quot; Although I do think that animals should be raised when possible in a relative lack of pain and should be killed quickly and efficiently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the vegetarian cultural issue is really more about two things:</p>
<p>1) The implication inherent in veganism of being judgmental. I think it is wrong to eat animals, therefore you are being wrong when you eat animals every day as a core part of your culture and lifestyle. Sometimes this view of conflict is defensiveness on the part of the omnivore, sometimes it is proselytizing on the part of the vegan, but a basic conflict often develops.</p>
<p>2) The social inconvenience. I know when I invite people over I normally cook a roast or grill hamburgers. If there is a known vegetarian on the guest list I will need to add something else to the menu, and as a good host I would like it to still be something tasty. Since I don&#8217;t eat anything vegetarian that one could consider a main course, this will require some research, experimentation, and extra work. I understand this is as much of a hassle for the vegan as it is for someone hosting, but overall the inconvenience can still grate.</p>
<p>Personally I have examined the moral issue in depth and decided on something approximately summarized as&#8221;my ancestors didn&#8217;t claw their way to the top of the food chain so I could defer to a chicken&#8217;s feelings when it comes to my food.&#8221; Although I do think that animals should be raised when possible in a relative lack of pain and should be killed quickly and efficiently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/comment-page-1/#comment-7658</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 14:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3184#comment-7658</guid>
		<description>Kudo&#039;s to the author and comments, this is a great discussion.

The link above about being &quot;not built&quot; for veganism is an oft used link, that doesn&#039;t list any information on the childrens diet etc...or the mothers implementation of a smart vegan diet.  Imagine the malnutrition and obesity we have here in America (alone)....yet no one say&#039;s we&#039;re not meant for milk!  

Here&#039;s the American Dietetic Association on a vegetarian (+vegan) diet :

http://www.eatright.org/cps/rde/xchg/ada/hs.xsl/nutrition_5105_ENU_HTML.htm

Remember when discussing veggies having &quot;feelings&quot; that it&#039;s really not the issue.  Animals WE KNOW are able to suffer, and feel, so let&#039;s address them first.  Don&#039;t let the argument for plants rights devolve into veggie rights.....and remember if it does, and if what you &quot;really&quot; want to do is save plants, then going vegan does that as well, given 60%-80% of our farm land is used for animals feed.....

Being vegan is easy, it&#039;s convenient, and it&#039;s a pipeline to fantastic food.  It&#039;s strange the talk about it&#039;s difficulty, because, it&#039;s really just not hard to implement...I&#039;ve not seen a vegan perspective here yet.....and when you remove the ease, the ethical, and the taste argument, I think all that&#039;s left is the fear of a social stigma, and a label...and it&#039;s sad to me, if we&#039;d let that interfere with compassion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudo&#8217;s to the author and comments, this is a great discussion.</p>
<p>The link above about being &#8220;not built&#8221; for veganism is an oft used link, that doesn&#8217;t list any information on the childrens diet etc&#8230;or the mothers implementation of a smart vegan diet.  Imagine the malnutrition and obesity we have here in America (alone)&#8230;.yet no one say&#8217;s we&#8217;re not meant for milk!  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the American Dietetic Association on a vegetarian (+vegan) diet :</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eatright.org/cps/rde/xchg/ada/hs.xsl/nutrition_5105_ENU_HTML.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.eatright.org/cps/rde/xchg/ada/hs.xsl/nutrition_5105_ENU_HTML.htm</a></p>
<p>Remember when discussing veggies having &#8220;feelings&#8221; that it&#8217;s really not the issue.  Animals WE KNOW are able to suffer, and feel, so let&#8217;s address them first.  Don&#8217;t let the argument for plants rights devolve into veggie rights&#8230;..and remember if it does, and if what you &#8220;really&#8221; want to do is save plants, then going vegan does that as well, given 60%-80% of our farm land is used for animals feed&#8230;..</p>
<p>Being vegan is easy, it&#8217;s convenient, and it&#8217;s a pipeline to fantastic food.  It&#8217;s strange the talk about it&#8217;s difficulty, because, it&#8217;s really just not hard to implement&#8230;I&#8217;ve not seen a vegan perspective here yet&#8230;..and when you remove the ease, the ethical, and the taste argument, I think all that&#8217;s left is the fear of a social stigma, and a label&#8230;and it&#8217;s sad to me, if we&#8217;d let that interfere with compassion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewe</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/comment-page-1/#comment-7632</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3184#comment-7632</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1028854/How-strict-vegan-diet-children-ill.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Maybe we just weren&#039;t built for veganism.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1028854/How-strict-vegan-diet-children-ill.html" rel="nofollow">Maybe we just weren&#8217;t built for veganism.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/comment-page-1/#comment-7627</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 16:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3184#comment-7627</guid>
		<description>Absolutely.  And there&#039;s every reason to think that a lot of that insanely high-end stuff is pure placebo. But there are also folks out there who will insist that if *they* can&#039;t tell the difference between MP3s encoded at 128 vs. 320, nobody else can either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely.  And there&#8217;s every reason to think that a lot of that insanely high-end stuff is pure placebo. But there are also folks out there who will insist that if *they* can&#8217;t tell the difference between MP3s encoded at 128 vs. 320, nobody else can either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mack</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/comment-page-1/#comment-7624</link>
		<dc:creator>Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 14:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3184#comment-7624</guid>
		<description>Sure, but sometimes the emperor really is naked under those grapes. As evidence, I give you $7000 &quot;danceable&quot; speaker cables. The words &quot;gullible fool&quot; are aptly used to describe the reviewer (google Pear Cable and David Clark).

I have no doubt there are golden-ear audiophiles who hear subtleties I cannot, just as there are oenophiles who sense in wines what I cannot. But beware the temptation to extend that too far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, but sometimes the emperor really is naked under those grapes. As evidence, I give you $7000 &#8220;danceable&#8221; speaker cables. The words &#8220;gullible fool&#8221; are aptly used to describe the reviewer (google Pear Cable and David Clark).</p>
<p>I have no doubt there are golden-ear audiophiles who hear subtleties I cannot, just as there are oenophiles who sense in wines what I cannot. But beware the temptation to extend that too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Doland</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/comment-page-1/#comment-7620</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Doland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 03:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3184#comment-7620</guid>
		<description>On an unrelated note...

I&#039;m looking at your Last.fm widget, and I see entries for three movements from two different Philip Glass string quartets, followed immediately by &quot;CD Laser Lens Cleaner.&quot;

I know this not to be the case (because I know we both share a fondness and appreciation for Glass, Adams, Reich, etc.), but the playlist leaves me with a comedic mental image of someone naively listening to Philip Glass for a period of time, thoroughly convinced that their CD player is skipping, to the point where they deem in necessary to give &quot;CD Laser Lens Cleaner&quot; a spin in hopes of fixing the problem. Fruitlessly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On an unrelated note&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking at your Last.fm widget, and I see entries for three movements from two different Philip Glass string quartets, followed immediately by &#8220;CD Laser Lens Cleaner.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know this not to be the case (because I know we both share a fondness and appreciation for Glass, Adams, Reich, etc.), but the playlist leaves me with a comedic mental image of someone naively listening to Philip Glass for a period of time, thoroughly convinced that their CD player is skipping, to the point where they deem in necessary to give &#8220;CD Laser Lens Cleaner&#8221; a spin in hopes of fixing the problem. Fruitlessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the teeth</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/comment-page-1/#comment-7612</link>
		<dc:creator>the teeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 22:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3184#comment-7612</guid>
		<description>Adam: or not so subtly.  There are good reasons why some societies consider dietary restrictions or food allergies rude.  Participating in a communal meal and refusing to share the food everybody else is eating is hostile, and on some basic level, uncivilized.  Or at least it is if it is -- this mostly is not the case in the U.S., which is (mostly) for the good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam: or not so subtly.  There are good reasons why some societies consider dietary restrictions or food allergies rude.  Participating in a communal meal and refusing to share the food everybody else is eating is hostile, and on some basic level, uncivilized.  Or at least it is if it is &#8212; this mostly is not the case in the U.S., which is (mostly) for the good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/comment-page-1/#comment-7611</link>
		<dc:creator>LP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 22:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3184#comment-7611</guid>
		<description>&quot;But if a significant number of reasonable people have come to this conclusion, then thinking seriously about the question carries a real risk of being persuaded—and perhaps of feeling obligated to change one’s behavior.&quot;

I think this is right -- an awful lot of people are making significant choices about their lifestyles without ever really feeling like they&#039;re making choices -- they&#039;re just doing what &#039;everyone&#039; does. When &#039;everyone&#039; isn&#039;t doing it anymore, the need to actually determine their own preferences, moral intuitions, etc. is thrown into sharp relief, which is an uncomfortable feeling. I think this fear of having to consciously make decisions is part of what underlies this and other forms of rabid intolerance (like homophobia), especially among people who are old enough that they&#039;re pretty committed to the lifestyle they never really experienced choosing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But if a significant number of reasonable people have come to this conclusion, then thinking seriously about the question carries a real risk of being persuaded—and perhaps of feeling obligated to change one’s behavior.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think this is right &#8212; an awful lot of people are making significant choices about their lifestyles without ever really feeling like they&#8217;re making choices &#8212; they&#8217;re just doing what &#8216;everyone&#8217; does. When &#8216;everyone&#8217; isn&#8217;t doing it anymore, the need to actually determine their own preferences, moral intuitions, etc. is thrown into sharp relief, which is an uncomfortable feeling. I think this fear of having to consciously make decisions is part of what underlies this and other forms of rabid intolerance (like homophobia), especially among people who are old enough that they&#8217;re pretty committed to the lifestyle they never really experienced choosing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/comment-page-1/#comment-7610</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3184#comment-7610</guid>
		<description>Contra Ben, I don&#039;t think the animus toward vegetarians has much at all to do with the histrionics of groups like PETA. As a meat-eater myself, I&#039;ve long been puzzled by the depth of antagonism of many towards a lifestyle (or moral choice, or what have you) that at worst is entirely harmless. Often this hostility is coupled to a bizarre and tedious form of compensatory machismo: &quot;I like to kill the cow myself and gnaw a chunk out of its hide har har!&quot;

I&#039;m pretty sure I saw this sort of stuff going on long before I knew anything of what PETA was about. I suspect the issue is that food is entwined deeply with cultural and social considerations, many of which are subtly threatened or undermined by vegetarianism. Of course, in this day and age, it&#039;s a bit rich to suggest our social structure is in any meaningful way threatened by vegetarianism, which is why self-conscious &quot;carnivores&quot; usually come across as boors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contra Ben, I don&#8217;t think the animus toward vegetarians has much at all to do with the histrionics of groups like PETA. As a meat-eater myself, I&#8217;ve long been puzzled by the depth of antagonism of many towards a lifestyle (or moral choice, or what have you) that at worst is entirely harmless. Often this hostility is coupled to a bizarre and tedious form of compensatory machismo: &#8220;I like to kill the cow myself and gnaw a chunk out of its hide har har!&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure I saw this sort of stuff going on long before I knew anything of what PETA was about. I suspect the issue is that food is entwined deeply with cultural and social considerations, many of which are subtly threatened or undermined by vegetarianism. Of course, in this day and age, it&#8217;s a bit rich to suggest our social structure is in any meaningful way threatened by vegetarianism, which is why self-conscious &#8220;carnivores&#8221; usually come across as boors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the teeth</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/05/13/sour-grapes/comment-page-1/#comment-7609</link>
		<dc:creator>the teeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3184#comment-7609</guid>
		<description>The phenomena you talk about is real, and &#039;moral sour grapes&#039; is a great label for it.  In the specific case of ethical vegetarianism, though, I think dismissive responses that looks like moral sour grapes are sometimes something a little different.  Dietary decisions are among the most important moral decisions we make, if only because of their frequency.  It&#039;s quite possible for someone who has spent a lot of energy thinking deeply about sincerely about food to be entirely comfortable with killing animals for meat.  Such a person could think, further,  that a moral approach to food which begins and ends with &#039;killing animals is bad&#039; is not just wrong, but also lazy, and encourages the adherent to blithely make all sorts of immoral decisions about food.

I&#039;m not this person -- I believe that while a vegetarian diet allows tons of crummy behaviour, it also by necessity prevents most of the nastiest results of our meals, so it&#039;s hard to get indignant.  Factory farms are dreadful for all sorts of reasons, and the cruelty inflicted on animals is one of the biggest problems with them.  Still, I&#039;m comfortable with shooting a deer or eating pork (from an admittedly very intelligent, and adorable hog) raised on an ethical farm (an admittedly fuzzy and undefined porn-like quality).  An &#039;ethically-vegetarian&#039; diet that consists mostly of processed foods produced in a petroleum heavy, highly-polluting fashion still gets most of the biggest things right -- but it&#039;s hard not to be annoyed &amp; maybe a little dismissive if this person acts as if his decisions are far more enlightened than our principled carnivore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The phenomena you talk about is real, and &#8216;moral sour grapes&#8217; is a great label for it.  In the specific case of ethical vegetarianism, though, I think dismissive responses that looks like moral sour grapes are sometimes something a little different.  Dietary decisions are among the most important moral decisions we make, if only because of their frequency.  It&#8217;s quite possible for someone who has spent a lot of energy thinking deeply about sincerely about food to be entirely comfortable with killing animals for meat.  Such a person could think, further,  that a moral approach to food which begins and ends with &#8216;killing animals is bad&#8217; is not just wrong, but also lazy, and encourages the adherent to blithely make all sorts of immoral decisions about food.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not this person &#8212; I believe that while a vegetarian diet allows tons of crummy behaviour, it also by necessity prevents most of the nastiest results of our meals, so it&#8217;s hard to get indignant.  Factory farms are dreadful for all sorts of reasons, and the cruelty inflicted on animals is one of the biggest problems with them.  Still, I&#8217;m comfortable with shooting a deer or eating pork (from an admittedly very intelligent, and adorable hog) raised on an ethical farm (an admittedly fuzzy and undefined porn-like quality).  An &#8216;ethically-vegetarian&#8217; diet that consists mostly of processed foods produced in a petroleum heavy, highly-polluting fashion still gets most of the biggest things right &#8212; but it&#8217;s hard not to be annoyed &amp; maybe a little dismissive if this person acts as if his decisions are far more enlightened than our principled carnivore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

