<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate Change and Argumentative Fallacies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Skeptical Chat With…Dan Moutal of &#8216;Irregular Climate&#8217; &#124; Michigan Skeptics Association</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/comment-page-2/#comment-13078</link>
		<dc:creator>A Skeptical Chat With…Dan Moutal of &#8216;Irregular Climate&#8217; &#124; Michigan Skeptics Association</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 14:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3003#comment-13078</guid>
		<description>[...] detailed explanation in order to demonstrate why they are wrong. Julian Sanchez calls this a &#8220;one way hash argument&#8221; because these arguments are easy to make, but difficult to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] detailed explanation in order to demonstrate why they are wrong. Julian Sanchez calls this a &#8220;one way hash argument&#8221; because these arguments are easy to make, but difficult to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 100 Ways to Kill a Concept &#171; Unapologetically Unstructured</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/comment-page-2/#comment-12158</link>
		<dc:creator>100 Ways to Kill a Concept &#171; Unapologetically Unstructured</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3003#comment-12158</guid>
		<description>[...] a post on “One Way Hash” Arguments, a term coined by Julian Sanchez in his excellent post on Climate Change and Argumentative Fallacies . The context of Sanchez’s post is a discussion about the difficulties of refuting false [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a post on “One Way Hash” Arguments, a term coined by Julian Sanchez in his excellent post on Climate Change and Argumentative Fallacies . The context of Sanchez’s post is a discussion about the difficulties of refuting false [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion Delgado</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/comment-page-2/#comment-10552</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Delgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3003#comment-10552</guid>
		<description>Where are you finding mature and honest libertarians? Who actually want to do anything but exploit and harm other people?

I think it&#039;s a relatively pure scam, equivalent to the divine right of kings c. the Middle Ages. And, if anything, the libertarians of today are worse than those of yesteryear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are you finding mature and honest libertarians? Who actually want to do anything but exploit and harm other people?</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a relatively pure scam, equivalent to the divine right of kings c. the Middle Ages. And, if anything, the libertarians of today are worse than those of yesteryear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Bullshit Often Sounds Better Than The Real Thing &#171; Gravity Loss</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/comment-page-2/#comment-10544</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Bullshit Often Sounds Better Than The Real Thing &#171; Gravity Loss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3003#comment-10544</guid>
		<description>[...] 2010.01.31 by gravityloss    From all places, a libertarian, who is arguing for laymen to trust experts. Come to think of it, there’s a certain class of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2010.01.31 by gravityloss    From all places, a libertarian, who is arguing for laymen to trust experts. Come to think of it, there’s a certain class of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veritas</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/comment-page-2/#comment-10536</link>
		<dc:creator>Veritas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3003#comment-10536</guid>
		<description>How low can it go? It is amazing to see the depths of those who only have ad hominem to share:


http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/19458

Andrew Weaver, IPCC Computer Modeler and Political Chameleon
 By Dr. Tim Ball  Friday, January 29, 2010

... among the most duplicitous and disingenuous members of the IPCC as Lead author and participant in the chapter on computer models.
Blah blah 
Dr David Keith who lives in Alberta, but is a rabid devotee of the IPCC and the alarmist views on climate change. His views are easily explained. His research requires considerable.
Blah blah perverted 
Blah blah blinded 
Blah blah bullyboy 
Blah blah, climate scientists that could only – even in the most generous of terms – be described as scandalous, and almost certainly criminal.  
Blah blah blah. By Dr. Tim Ball  Friday, January 29, 2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How low can it go? It is amazing to see the depths of those who only have ad hominem to share:</p>
<p><a href="http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/19458" rel="nofollow">http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/19458</a></p>
<p>Andrew Weaver, IPCC Computer Modeler and Political Chameleon<br />
 By Dr. Tim Ball  Friday, January 29, 2010</p>
<p>&#8230; among the most duplicitous and disingenuous members of the IPCC as Lead author and participant in the chapter on computer models.<br />
Blah blah<br />
Dr David Keith who lives in Alberta, but is a rabid devotee of the IPCC and the alarmist views on climate change. His views are easily explained. His research requires considerable.<br />
Blah blah perverted<br />
Blah blah blinded<br />
Blah blah bullyboy<br />
Blah blah, climate scientists that could only – even in the most generous of terms – be described as scandalous, and almost certainly criminal.<br />
Blah blah blah. By Dr. Tim Ball  Friday, January 29, 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul M. Jones &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Logical Fallacy vs Bayesian Reasoning</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/comment-page-2/#comment-10302</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul M. Jones &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Logical Fallacy vs Bayesian Reasoning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3003#comment-10302</guid>
		<description>[...] via Climate Change and Argumentative Fallacies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via Climate Change and Argumentative Fallacies. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media balance &#171; Sköne Oke</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/comment-page-2/#comment-10169</link>
		<dc:creator>Media balance &#171; Sköne Oke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3003#comment-10169</guid>
		<description>[...] Julian Sanchez makes some valid contributions:  We’re accustomed to calling the “argument from authority” a fallacy, but in fact, that’s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Julian Sanchez makes some valid contributions:  We’re accustomed to calling the “argument from authority” a fallacy, but in fact, that’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Trotter &#187; Who owns the data</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/comment-page-2/#comment-9708</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Trotter &#187; Who owns the data</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3003#comment-9708</guid>
		<description>[...] But asking the question at all is a hash argument. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But asking the question at all is a hash argument. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Care and the &#8220;One Way Hash&#8221; &#124; Extreme Conservatives</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/comment-page-2/#comment-9256</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Care and the &#8220;One Way Hash&#8221; &#124; Extreme Conservatives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3003#comment-9256</guid>
		<description>[...] Sanchez, now a research fellow at the Cato Institute, has dubbed arguments of this sort &quot;one way hash arguments.&quot; The term is a nod to one way hash [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sanchez, now a research fellow at the Cato Institute, has dubbed arguments of this sort &quot;one way hash arguments.&quot; The term is a nod to one way hash [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: composer777</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/04/06/climate-change-and-argumentative-fallacies/comment-page-2/#comment-9226</link>
		<dc:creator>composer777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=3003#comment-9226</guid>
		<description>Which makes me wonder, is the term one-way hash argument a one-way hash argument?  

A one way hash is a metaphor for what the author describes in only the most autistic sense, in the sense that one could say that it&#039;s easier for one side to make up something than it is for another side to come up with a truthful rebuttal.  But, other than that, I don&#039;t see how a one-way hash explains or add insight this phenomena.  Fact is, it doesn&#039;t, it just makes it sound good, kind of like a one-way hash argument makes false statements sound good by dressing them up in technical jargon.  I think one could come up with a better metaphor for what is going on here than one-way hash.  Then again, maybe &quot;one-way hash&quot; should stick, after all, it&#039;s a bit ironic that the metaphor that is claimed to  explain it does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which makes me wonder, is the term one-way hash argument a one-way hash argument?  </p>
<p>A one way hash is a metaphor for what the author describes in only the most autistic sense, in the sense that one could say that it&#8217;s easier for one side to make up something than it is for another side to come up with a truthful rebuttal.  But, other than that, I don&#8217;t see how a one-way hash explains or add insight this phenomena.  Fact is, it doesn&#8217;t, it just makes it sound good, kind of like a one-way hash argument makes false statements sound good by dressing them up in technical jargon.  I think one could come up with a better metaphor for what is going on here than one-way hash.  Then again, maybe &#8220;one-way hash&#8221; should stick, after all, it&#8217;s a bit ironic that the metaphor that is claimed to  explain it does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

