Comments on: Did you know the word “gullible” doesn’t appear in the dictionary? http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/01/06/did-you-know-the-word-gullible-doesnt-appear-in-the-dictionary/ Just another geek in the geek kingdom Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:30:34 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Sam McManus http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/01/06/did-you-know-the-word-gullible-doesnt-appear-in-the-dictionary/comment-page-1/#comment-6749 Sam McManus Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:59:04 +0000 http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=2884#comment-6749 Dude, I checked, gullible is totally in the dictionary :p Dude, I checked, gullible is totally in the dictionary

:p

]]> By: David Nieporent http://www.juliansanchez.com/2009/01/06/did-you-know-the-word-gullible-doesnt-appear-in-the-dictionary/comment-page-1/#comment-6732 David Nieporent Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:56:58 +0000 http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=2884#comment-6732 <i>Addendum II: Dave Weigel notes that Coulter has a penchant for playing the victim, falsely claiming that USA Today had “fired” her after the paper sent back a poorly-written piece for rewrites.</i> Let's not forget when she was 'fired' <a href="http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MmVhMGI5NGFjZjIxMjBmMTE5N2FlYzgzNGFmZTYzZGQ=" rel="nofollow">by National Review</a> for pretty much the same reason. Addendum II: Dave Weigel notes that Coulter has a penchant for playing the victim, falsely claiming that USA Today had “fired” her after the paper sent back a poorly-written piece for rewrites.

Let’s not forget when she was ‘fired’ by National Review for pretty much the same reason.

]]>