<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/08/11/open-source-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/08/11/open-source-journalism/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/08/11/open-source-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-5592</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=2571#comment-5592</guid>
		<description>I w0rry about the potential chilling effect here. Would sources be less likely to grant interviews if they knew that the MP3s of them would be posted for all the world to hear? Also, what of off-the-record comments? I suppose you could cut those out using Audacity or something, but it would be pretty obvious, including to the source&#039;s rivals, that they were giving OTR info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I w0rry about the potential chilling effect here. Would sources be less likely to grant interviews if they knew that the MP3s of them would be posted for all the world to hear? Also, what of off-the-record comments? I suppose you could cut those out using Audacity or something, but it would be pretty obvious, including to the source&#8217;s rivals, that they were giving OTR info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

