Comments on: FISA: Actually “Exclusive Means” for Surveillance http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/07/03/fisa-actually-exclusive-means-for-surveillance/ Just another geek in the geek kingdom Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2 By: Julian Sanchez http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/07/03/fisa-actually-exclusive-means-for-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-5030 Julian Sanchez Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:19:04 +0000 http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=2509#comment-5030 Just as a reminder, there's actually no question that they WERE surveilled, only whether they can show it without using the sealed document that proves it. Just as a reminder, there’s actually no question that they WERE surveilled, only whether they can show it without using the sealed document that proves it.

]]> By: jwh http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/07/03/fisa-actually-exclusive-means-for-surveillance/comment-page-1/#comment-5026 jwh Thu, 03 Jul 2008 21:05:33 +0000 http://www.juliansanchez.com/?p=2509#comment-5026 Jon Eisenberg, the attorney for the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation: "I think there's compelling, unclassified circumstantial evidence that would lead any reasonable person to believe our clients were surveilled." .....let the kangaroo court proceedings commence....... Jon Eisenberg, the attorney for the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation: “I think there’s compelling, unclassified circumstantial evidence that would lead any reasonable person to believe our clients were surveilled.”

…..let the kangaroo court proceedings commence…….

]]>