<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Last Word</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3700</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2167#comment-3700</guid>
		<description>Sorry, Tim -- Chinese are considered northern Asians by everyone.  And, Tim, we&#039;ve just establsiehd over at Dave Freidman&#039;s blog that you are a pathological liar ( https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19727420&amp;postID=982240221334824072 ): I&#039;m of course referring to yur blood libel &quot;Paleos are ex-Fascists, or neo-Fascists.&quot;  I believe nothing you say -- we know you lie.

Travis, I had a subscription to Reason from about 1974 through the early &#039;80s.

Then I grew up.

Someday, you will too.

Dave

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, Tim &#8212; Chinese are considered northern Asians by everyone.  And, Tim, we&#8217;ve just establsiehd over at Dave Freidman&#8217;s blog that you are a pathological liar ( <a href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19727420&#038;postID=982240221334824072" rel="nofollow">https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=19727420&#038;postID=982240221334824072</a> ): I&#8217;m of course referring to yur blood libel &#8220;Paleos are ex-Fascists, or neo-Fascists.&#8221;  I believe nothing you say &#8212; we know you lie.</p>
<p>Travis, I had a subscription to Reason from about 1974 through the early &#8217;80s.</p>
<p>Then I grew up.</p>
<p>Someday, you will too.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3699</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2167#comment-3699</guid>
		<description>Oh c&#039;mon, he&#039;s precious, leave him be.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh c&#8217;mon, he&#8217;s precious, leave him be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3698</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2167#comment-3698</guid>
		<description>Dave,

None of what you said makes any sense, which makes it all the more bizarre that you concluded your last comment with the call for clarity.

Maybe you would benefit from reading Reason and the various Cato publications so that you actually know what they stand for before you start attacking them as the enemy.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>None of what you said makes any sense, which makes it all the more bizarre that you concluded your last comment with the call for clarity.</p>
<p>Maybe you would benefit from reading Reason and the various Cato publications so that you actually know what they stand for before you start attacking them as the enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Starr</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3697</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2167#comment-3697</guid>
		<description>To &quot;PhysicistDave&quot;: Good for you that your family is so cosmopolitan.  However, I&#039;ve personally witnessed top Rockwellians like Hoppe &amp; Raico saying that only Northern Asians ought to be permitted into America, because they allegedly have high IQ scores, while southeast Asians - like your family members - ought to be kept out because of their allegedly low IQ scores.

I also know someone who witnessed Burt Blumert saying that Chinese people should only be allowed into America so they could open Chinese restaurants.  Too bad for your family if any of them are Chinese &amp; don&#039;t want to make their livings serving food to the like of Blumert.

How does that make you feel about the Rockwellians?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To &#8220;PhysicistDave&#8221;: Good for you that your family is so cosmopolitan.  However, I&#8217;ve personally witnessed top Rockwellians like Hoppe &#038; Raico saying that only Northern Asians ought to be permitted into America, because they allegedly have high IQ scores, while southeast Asians &#8211; like your family members &#8211; ought to be kept out because of their allegedly low IQ scores.</p>
<p>I also know someone who witnessed Burt Blumert saying that Chinese people should only be allowed into America so they could open Chinese restaurants.  Too bad for your family if any of them are Chinese &#038; don&#8217;t want to make their livings serving food to the like of Blumert.</p>
<p>How does that make you feel about the Rockwellians?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhysicistDave</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3696</link>
		<dc:creator>PhysicistDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2167#comment-3696</guid>
		<description>Julian and Tony,

I&#039;m truly glad to see we&#039;re on the same wavelength here -- I&#039;ve nothing against you guys, at least nothing more than I have against your political pals like McCain, Giuliani, Thompson, Hillary, etc.

But surely it is more healthy all around to just recognize that we cosmopolitan Paulistas and you provincial, backward-looking, politically-correct, twentieth-century &quot;libertarians&quot; are just not part of the same political movement.

We&#039;re political opponents, just as much as Mike Huckabee and Barack Obama are political opponents.

I hope you guys lose politically, and if you ever manage to actually run any candidates for office, I&#039;ll oppose them and vote against them.  Of course, you&#039;d lose anyway -- you&#039;ve never actually won an election, but I&#039;d have some fun.

Clarity is a good thing.

PhysicistDave
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julian and Tony,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m truly glad to see we&#8217;re on the same wavelength here &#8212; I&#8217;ve nothing against you guys, at least nothing more than I have against your political pals like McCain, Giuliani, Thompson, Hillary, etc.</p>
<p>But surely it is more healthy all around to just recognize that we cosmopolitan Paulistas and you provincial, backward-looking, politically-correct, twentieth-century &#8220;libertarians&#8221; are just not part of the same political movement.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re political opponents, just as much as Mike Huckabee and Barack Obama are political opponents.</p>
<p>I hope you guys lose politically, and if you ever manage to actually run any candidates for office, I&#8217;ll oppose them and vote against them.  Of course, you&#8217;d lose anyway &#8212; you&#8217;ve never actually won an election, but I&#8217;d have some fun.</p>
<p>Clarity is a good thing.</p>
<p>PhysicistDave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3695</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2167#comment-3695</guid>
		<description>Julian, I agree.  Precisely why I&#039;m calling myself a liberal now and reclaiming the title of classical liberal.  The term liberal may have its baggage...but nothing like this.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julian, I agree.  Precisely why I&#8217;m calling myself a liberal now and reclaiming the title of classical liberal.  The term liberal may have its baggage&#8230;but nothing like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3694</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2167#comment-3694</guid>
		<description>Eh.  Well, perhaps I&#039;ll have to call myself something else, then.  I&#039;ll live.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh.  Well, perhaps I&#8217;ll have to call myself something else, then.  I&#8217;ll live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhmqaz</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3693</link>
		<dc:creator>dhmqaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2167#comment-3693</guid>
		<description>Julian,

I’m afraid you don’t get it.

My wife and I both have Ph.Ds from Stanford.  She’s the daughter of Chinese immigrants, and the kids and I are learning Chinese.  We’re not religious believers.  We’ve traveled to various different countries and continents.  I hold several patents on various high-tech inventions.

We’re the very model of a modern, multicultural, highly-educated, cosmopolitan, tech-savvy family.

We’re also happy Ron Paul supporters.

Let me put this as clearly as I can: I like the quips about New York City: they’re funny and on-target.  Best of all, they irritate the devil out of all you PC folks.

I wish that Congressman Paul would say more stuff like this on the campaign trail.

Think about it.  We Paulistas are now the overwhelmingly dominant wing of the libertarian movement, in numbers, in organization, and in the view of the news media.  For the rest of your life, if you call yourself a “libertarian,” people will associate you with us Paulistas.

Reason, Cato, et al. are the libertarian movement of the past, of the twentieth century.  We are the libertarians of the twenty-first century.

The future of libertarianism belongs to us.

Get used to it.

PhysicistDave

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julian,</p>
<p>I’m afraid you don’t get it.</p>
<p>My wife and I both have Ph.Ds from Stanford.  She’s the daughter of Chinese immigrants, and the kids and I are learning Chinese.  We’re not religious believers.  We’ve traveled to various different countries and continents.  I hold several patents on various high-tech inventions.</p>
<p>We’re the very model of a modern, multicultural, highly-educated, cosmopolitan, tech-savvy family.</p>
<p>We’re also happy Ron Paul supporters.</p>
<p>Let me put this as clearly as I can: I like the quips about New York City: they’re funny and on-target.  Best of all, they irritate the devil out of all you PC folks.</p>
<p>I wish that Congressman Paul would say more stuff like this on the campaign trail.</p>
<p>Think about it.  We Paulistas are now the overwhelmingly dominant wing of the libertarian movement, in numbers, in organization, and in the view of the news media.  For the rest of your life, if you call yourself a “libertarian,” people will associate you with us Paulistas.</p>
<p>Reason, Cato, et al. are the libertarian movement of the past, of the twentieth century.  We are the libertarians of the twenty-first century.</p>
<p>The future of libertarianism belongs to us.</p>
<p>Get used to it.</p>
<p>PhysicistDave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wnb</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3692</link>
		<dc:creator>wnb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2167#comment-3692</guid>
		<description>Ever since Mr. Raimondo was selling his services as the &quot;Italian Stallion&quot; he has had a clear problem with telling the truth. Now that he&#039;s tied in to the Rockwell crowd he&#039;s very pro Paul and excusing the newsletters. Yet in 1988 Raimondo was screaming how Ron Paul exemplified the radical right taking over the Libertarian Party. Apparently the money is better where he&#039;s at now. Apparently some people never change professions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since Mr. Raimondo was selling his services as the &#8220;Italian Stallion&#8221; he has had a clear problem with telling the truth. Now that he&#8217;s tied in to the Rockwell crowd he&#8217;s very pro Paul and excusing the newsletters. Yet in 1988 Raimondo was screaming how Ron Paul exemplified the radical right taking over the Libertarian Party. Apparently the money is better where he&#8217;s at now. Apparently some people never change professions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2008/01/20/one-last-word/comment-page-1/#comment-3691</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2167#comment-3691</guid>
		<description>Well, I think I cover that to some extent in the post below.  I think it&#039;s clear in itself why people generally sympathetic to Ron Paul might have a legitimate interest in knowing more about how his name ended up on a bunch of vile screeds, and whether the people responsible, supposing Paul didn&#039;t write them, continue to influence him.  The case for basic newsworthiness seems pretty easy to me.  At that point, the question is: Do we ignore an otherwise viable story because we shouldn&#039;t say anything unflattering about people on Our Team?  And that, I think, I do deal with below.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think I cover that to some extent in the post below.  I think it&#8217;s clear in itself why people generally sympathetic to Ron Paul might have a legitimate interest in knowing more about how his name ended up on a bunch of vile screeds, and whether the people responsible, supposing Paul didn&#8217;t write them, continue to influence him.  The case for basic newsworthiness seems pretty easy to me.  At that point, the question is: Do we ignore an otherwise viable story because we shouldn&#8217;t say anything unflattering about people on Our Team?  And that, I think, I do deal with below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

