<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Redesign Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3257</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2068#comment-3257</guid>
		<description>I agree with the notion that the faux-paper is really, really bad.  It gets in the way of the words, which is a damning criticism.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the notion that the faux-paper is really, really bad.  It gets in the way of the words, which is a damning criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3256</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2068#comment-3256</guid>
		<description>Brutal, stylish only in the eyes of people who confuse glitter for gold.

The current design is good enough.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brutal, stylish only in the eyes of people who confuse glitter for gold.</p>
<p>The current design is good enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3255</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 04:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2068#comment-3255</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;m the only one who likes it. I used to like the simple look, but it seems everybody is doing it these days. I think this new design is stylish.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;m the only one who likes it. I used to like the simple look, but it seems everybody is doing it these days. I think this new design is stylish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric the .5b</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3254</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric the .5b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2068#comment-3254</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I love how he said &quot;no specific comments at this stage&quot; and then everyone gave a bunch of specific, critical comments.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Does &quot;Ick&quot; suit you better?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I love how he said &#8220;no specific comments at this stage&#8221; and then everyone gave a bunch of specific, critical comments.</p></blockquote>
<p>Does &#8220;Ick&#8221; suit you better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oy</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3253</link>
		<dc:creator>Oy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 03:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2068#comment-3253</guid>
		<description>I love how he said &quot;no specific comments at this stage&quot; and then everyone gave a bunch of specific, critical comments.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how he said &#8220;no specific comments at this stage&#8221; and then everyone gave a bunch of specific, critical comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rue Des Quatre Vents</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3252</link>
		<dc:creator>Rue Des Quatre Vents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2068#comment-3252</guid>
		<description>Straight out of Pearl Jam&#039;s Vitology.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Straight out of Pearl Jam&#8217;s Vitology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherine</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2068#comment-3251</guid>
		<description>the font is unreadable; i&#039;d remove the line around the text box as well and make that column wider. the header and the title are cool.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the font is unreadable; i&#8217;d remove the line around the text box as well and make that column wider. the header and the title are cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3250</link>
		<dc:creator>LP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2068#comment-3250</guid>
		<description>How about this: make super-cool, interesting, faux-antique masthead, even creating new ones when the artistic impulse comes over you (a la Dooce), but keep the content clean. The beauty of the blog format is that it enables readers to assimilate your thoughts quickly by following fairly standard formatting conventions and using sans-serif fonts (easier to read on a screen).
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, probably almost everyone reads you by RSS anyway, but a difficult-to-read blog format risks alienating first-time visitors who are insufficiently patient.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this: make super-cool, interesting, faux-antique masthead, even creating new ones when the artistic impulse comes over you (a la Dooce), but keep the content clean. The beauty of the blog format is that it enables readers to assimilate your thoughts quickly by following fairly standard formatting conventions and using sans-serif fonts (easier to read on a screen).</p>
<p>On the other hand, probably almost everyone reads you by RSS anyway, but a difficult-to-read blog format risks alienating first-time visitors who are insufficiently patient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tde</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3249</link>
		<dc:creator>tde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2068#comment-3249</guid>
		<description>Ugh - horrible.

Current design would be fine without the dotted line.

I come for the words.  Not frilly, eccentric pseudo-retro nonsense.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh &#8211; horrible.</p>
<p>Current design would be fine without the dotted line.</p>
<p>I come for the words.  Not frilly, eccentric pseudo-retro nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/11/05/redesign-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-3248</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=2068#comment-3248</guid>
		<description>Everything about it is too hard to read. Different fonts, please, and make the navigation links more straightforward (&quot;Older&quot; &amp; &quot;Newer&quot;). The graphics are okay. Good title.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything about it is too hard to read. Different fonts, please, and make the navigation links more straightforward (&#8220;Older&#8221; &#038; &#8220;Newer&#8221;). The graphics are okay. Good title.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

