<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are We All Eugenicists Now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/08/01/are-we-all-eugenicists-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/08/01/are-we-all-eugenicists-now/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:46:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/08/01/are-we-all-eugenicists-now/comment-page-1/#comment-2876</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 01:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1953#comment-2876</guid>
		<description>I have a somewhat relevant post.

http://draggedfromthebottom.blogspot.com/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a somewhat relevant post.</p>
<p><a href="http://draggedfromthebottom.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://draggedfromthebottom.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Gould</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/08/01/are-we-all-eugenicists-now/comment-page-1/#comment-2875</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1953#comment-2875</guid>
		<description>The &quot;eugenic&quot; snipe is particular silly as respects Down Syndrome as is not in the gene pool at all -- with only a single-digit number of exceptions, Down Syndrome victims cannot reproduce, and the condition was not inherited in those cases.  So a eugenist, meaning to improve the human gene stock, would not even approach Down Syndrome as an eugenic cause.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;eugenic&#8221; snipe is particular silly as respects Down Syndrome as is not in the gene pool at all &#8212; with only a single-digit number of exceptions, Down Syndrome victims cannot reproduce, and the condition was not inherited in those cases.  So a eugenist, meaning to improve the human gene stock, would not even approach Down Syndrome as an eugenic cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/08/01/are-we-all-eugenicists-now/comment-page-1/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1953#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>Yet another entry in the increasingly capacious catagory of things Julian has written so I don&#039;t have to.  I suspect a healthy dose of Parfit would alleviate the dismal misconceptions endemic in this conversation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another entry in the increasingly capacious catagory of things Julian has written so I don&#8217;t have to.  I suspect a healthy dose of Parfit would alleviate the dismal misconceptions endemic in this conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
