<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phildickery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/12/phildickery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/12/phildickery/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeo</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/12/phildickery/comment-page-1/#comment-2789</link>
		<dc:creator>joeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 23:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1924#comment-2789</guid>
		<description>I was really surprised how badly written &quot;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?&quot; was when I read it after the movie came out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was really surprised how badly written &#8220;Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?&#8221; was when I read it after the movie came out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/12/phildickery/comment-page-1/#comment-2788</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 18:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1924#comment-2788</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think any discussion of great prose stylists in sci-fi is complete without discussing Alfred Bester, who could not only turn a phrase, but had some awesome experimentations in the use of typography to create imagery.  The party of telepaths in &quot;The Demolished Man&quot; is a great case in point.

Other great prose stylists in sci-fi:

Walter M. Miller, Jr.
Octavia Butler
M.J. Engh (just thinking about Arslan gives me chills sometimes)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think any discussion of great prose stylists in sci-fi is complete without discussing Alfred Bester, who could not only turn a phrase, but had some awesome experimentations in the use of typography to create imagery.  The party of telepaths in &#8220;The Demolished Man&#8221; is a great case in point.</p>
<p>Other great prose stylists in sci-fi:</p>
<p>Walter M. Miller, Jr.<br />
Octavia Butler<br />
M.J. Engh (just thinking about Arslan gives me chills sometimes)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/12/phildickery/comment-page-1/#comment-2787</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1924#comment-2787</guid>
		<description>I agree with your points on Dick, but I also think that this should have kept him from inclusion in Library of America.  He may be a great sci-fi thinker, but he&#039;s simply not one of America&#039;s greatest writers.  Nor is he, as you point out, even among the ranks of the best science fiction writers.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your points on Dick, but I also think that this should have kept him from inclusion in Library of America.  He may be a great sci-fi thinker, but he&#8217;s simply not one of America&#8217;s greatest writers.  Nor is he, as you point out, even among the ranks of the best science fiction writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foolishmortal</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/12/phildickery/comment-page-1/#comment-2786</link>
		<dc:creator>foolishmortal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 07:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1924#comment-2786</guid>
		<description>Re: Dick in particular, you certainly have a point, and Dick perhaps exemplifies your larger point about sci-fi in general in that his ideas were brilliant and his prose awful. However, you&#039;re missing great SF authors who also happen to be be great novelists: Samuel Delaney, Gene Wolfe, and John Crowley. M. John Harrison might make it onto this list in time.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Dick in particular, you certainly have a point, and Dick perhaps exemplifies your larger point about sci-fi in general in that his ideas were brilliant and his prose awful. However, you&#8217;re missing great SF authors who also happen to be be great novelists: Samuel Delaney, Gene Wolfe, and John Crowley. M. John Harrison might make it onto this list in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry M</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/12/phildickery/comment-page-1/#comment-2785</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1924#comment-2785</guid>
		<description>Well ... without stepping specifically into the Dick debate, you have a point generally, but maybe not as strong as one as you think.  Now while it&#039;s probably true that most science fiction doesn&#039;t stand up well to serious literary fiction, I think that the quality of the prose in most of the better modern science fiction is pretty high. I mean, it&#039;s well written in the most basic sense.  That was far less true of most of the classics - I mean, re-reading a lot of that stuff now is sort of cringe inducing, but I could make a pretty long list of current writers of science fiction and fantasy that are, at the very least, solid prose stylists. Just to name a few: Mieville, Stross, Powers, Banks, and Gibson.

Of course you are correct that this isn&#039;t the only (or probably even the main) reason that Science fiction deserves to be taken seriously.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8230; without stepping specifically into the Dick debate, you have a point generally, but maybe not as strong as one as you think.  Now while it&#8217;s probably true that most science fiction doesn&#8217;t stand up well to serious literary fiction, I think that the quality of the prose in most of the better modern science fiction is pretty high. I mean, it&#8217;s well written in the most basic sense.  That was far less true of most of the classics &#8211; I mean, re-reading a lot of that stuff now is sort of cringe inducing, but I could make a pretty long list of current writers of science fiction and fantasy that are, at the very least, solid prose stylists. Just to name a few: Mieville, Stross, Powers, Banks, and Gibson.</p>
<p>Of course you are correct that this isn&#8217;t the only (or probably even the main) reason that Science fiction deserves to be taken seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Henley</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/12/phildickery/comment-page-1/#comment-2784</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Henley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 05:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1924#comment-2784</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t hate you for this post, but I do pity you.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t hate you for this post, but I do pity you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony C</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/12/phildickery/comment-page-1/#comment-2783</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 04:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1924#comment-2783</guid>
		<description>Several years ago I read &quot;Ubik&quot; and I clearly recall coming away from it thinking it was a work of great brilliance - but weirdly enough I can&#039;t actually remember what the hell happened in it.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago I read &#8220;Ubik&#8221; and I clearly recall coming away from it thinking it was a work of great brilliance &#8211; but weirdly enough I can&#8217;t actually remember what the hell happened in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

