<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ratatouille: The Populist Randianism of Brad Bird</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/06/ratatouille-the-populist-randianism-of-brad-bird/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/06/ratatouille-the-populist-randianism-of-brad-bird/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/06/ratatouille-the-populist-randianism-of-brad-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-2759</link>
		<dc:creator>LP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1910#comment-2759</guid>
		<description>Rand definitely has that &#039;stickiness&#039; factor, so that if you ever, even just for 2 days after reading Atlas Shrugged, saw that world through her lens, you can never quite shake it off, even as your philosophy matures beyond it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand definitely has that &#8216;stickiness&#8217; factor, so that if you ever, even just for 2 days after reading Atlas Shrugged, saw that world through her lens, you can never quite shake it off, even as your philosophy matures beyond it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/06/ratatouille-the-populist-randianism-of-brad-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-2758</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 23:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1910#comment-2758</guid>
		<description>Well, in the interviews where Bird has been asked about this, he denies being any kind of Randian or having consciously modeled his movies on her ideas.  But he also says he was &quot;into her&quot; back in his college days.

Now, I certainly believe that neither film was intentionally modeled on Rand&#039;s work, but there are enough thematic similarities, and even some plot parallels, to make me think it&#039;s likely some of the stuff that had resonated him back in his early 20s is still knocking around the back of his head.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, in the interviews where Bird has been asked about this, he denies being any kind of Randian or having consciously modeled his movies on her ideas.  But he also says he was &#8220;into her&#8221; back in his college days.</p>
<p>Now, I certainly believe that neither film was intentionally modeled on Rand&#8217;s work, but there are enough thematic similarities, and even some plot parallels, to make me think it&#8217;s likely some of the stuff that had resonated him back in his early 20s is still knocking around the back of his head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: washerdreyer</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/06/ratatouille-the-populist-randianism-of-brad-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-2757</link>
		<dc:creator>washerdreyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 07:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1910#comment-2757</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t read Rand or seen &lt;i&gt;Ratatouille&lt;/i&gt;, but don&#039;t see anything in this post to suggest that this isn&#039;t just a case of Bird independently discovering some Randian insights.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read Rand or seen <i>Ratatouille</i>, but don&#8217;t see anything in this post to suggest that this isn&#8217;t just a case of Bird independently discovering some Randian insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AC</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/06/ratatouille-the-populist-randianism-of-brad-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-2756</link>
		<dc:creator>AC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 01:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1910#comment-2756</guid>
		<description>Yeah, a similar theme hardly makes it the &quot;animated version of the Fountainhead&quot;. Lovely little pic though!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, a similar theme hardly makes it the &#8220;animated version of the Fountainhead&#8221;. Lovely little pic though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/07/06/ratatouille-the-populist-randianism-of-brad-bird/comment-page-1/#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator>LP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 06:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1910#comment-2755</guid>
		<description>Why I read this blog: posts like this. Not that the other commentary on more traditional blog topics isn&#039;t fun, but where else would I go for objectivist deconstruction of pop culture?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why I read this blog: posts like this. Not that the other commentary on more traditional blog topics isn&#8217;t fun, but where else would I go for objectivist deconstruction of pop culture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

