<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But It&#8217;s an ORGANIC Merger!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2512</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 18:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1844#comment-2512</guid>
		<description>With the number of large mergers that have occurred among grocery stores, it is hard to see much reason for preventing this one, unless there is interest in keeping organic chains small.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the number of large mergers that have occurred among grocery stores, it is hard to see much reason for preventing this one, unless there is interest in keeping organic chains small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveintheknow</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2511</link>
		<dc:creator>steveintheknow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1844#comment-2511</guid>
		<description>mcm is spot on.

But of course this doesn&#039;t stop me from &lt;i&gt;really, really&lt;/i&gt;, wishing we had a Trader Joe&#039;s too. What is the deal, why such a wait?

At any rate, I would expect Sun Harvest/Wild Oats to have access too better wholesale prices and adjust their retail prices accordingly before Whole Foods raised theirs.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mcm is spot on.</p>
<p>But of course this doesn&#8217;t stop me from <i>really, really</i>, wishing we had a Trader Joe&#8217;s too. What is the deal, why such a wait?</p>
<p>At any rate, I would expect Sun Harvest/Wild Oats to have access too better wholesale prices and adjust their retail prices accordingly before Whole Foods raised theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave W.</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2510</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1844#comment-2510</guid>
		<description>==============================================================

&quot;Always food&quot;

should have been

--Always good--

I was momentarily pre-occupied with delicious cage free scrambed eggs.  btw, there was a bit of discussion of cruelty free egges over at the &lt;i&gt;Hit&#039;n&#039;Run&lt;/i&gt; yesterday:

http://www.reason.com/blog/show/120593.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>==============================================================</p>
<p>&#8220;Always food&#8221;</p>
<p>should have been</p>
<p>&#8211;Always good&#8211;</p>
<p>I was momentarily pre-occupied with delicious cage free scrambed eggs.  btw, there was a bit of discussion of cruelty free egges over at the <i>Hit&#8217;n'Run</i> yesterday:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reason.com/blog/show/120593.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reason.com/blog/show/120593.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave W.</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2509</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1844#comment-2509</guid>
		<description>==============================================================

First off, thanks for blogging an antitrust issue.  Always food when these issues get attention.  They have been neglected for too long now.

Economically speaking, the story of antitrust law is the story of Milton Friedman&#039;s flip on antitrust law.  Specifically, Friedman was for  it, got a political appointment and then was suddenly against it.  Although the antitrust laws have never been taken off the books, and there is still nominal agency scrutiny of mergers, antitrust is simply a dead letter.  All sectors of the economy have proceeded, over time, to become far too consolidated, and this is the central economic problem of our time.  having read some of your previous writing on &quot;consumer choice,&quot;  I have a feeling that you pretty much get this, Mr. Sanchez.

What I think is interesting about Whole Foods getting a hard time is that it kind of confirms Freidman&#039;s flip flop on antitrust.  Near as I can tell, Freidman gave a couple of reasons for being for antitrust law before he was against it.  One reason was relection on decades of study -- aka, trust me I am an expert.  That reason is not compelling, of course, except to corporatarians.

His other reason is that consolidated companies will do whatever it takes to get their hands on the levers of antitrust law, in its execution, and will use antitrust law to crush smaller competitors, turning this body of law 180 degrees away from its intended consequences, like Goliath doing courtroom and agency ju jitsu.  This argument of Friedman&#039;s cannot be dismissed out of hand.

Returning to the Whole Foods proposed merger at hand, this could very well be a classic case of Whole Foods larger competitors using antitrust law to hurt Whole Foods and thereby help themselves.  If one agrees with this assessment, then there are  a couple possible reactions:

(i)  take this as yet another data point confirming Friedman&#039;s late career condemnation of antitrust law; or

(ii) use this as an opportunity to spread the word about what is wrong with antitrust law so that new laws can be conceived and implemented to address the observed antitrust law problem with enthusiasm and in good faith.

My feelings are somewhat mixed, but I favor approach (ii) because I don&#039;t think it has ever been tried.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>==============================================================</p>
<p>First off, thanks for blogging an antitrust issue.  Always food when these issues get attention.  They have been neglected for too long now.</p>
<p>Economically speaking, the story of antitrust law is the story of Milton Friedman&#8217;s flip on antitrust law.  Specifically, Friedman was for  it, got a political appointment and then was suddenly against it.  Although the antitrust laws have never been taken off the books, and there is still nominal agency scrutiny of mergers, antitrust is simply a dead letter.  All sectors of the economy have proceeded, over time, to become far too consolidated, and this is the central economic problem of our time.  having read some of your previous writing on &#8220;consumer choice,&#8221;  I have a feeling that you pretty much get this, Mr. Sanchez.</p>
<p>What I think is interesting about Whole Foods getting a hard time is that it kind of confirms Freidman&#8217;s flip flop on antitrust.  Near as I can tell, Freidman gave a couple of reasons for being for antitrust law before he was against it.  One reason was relection on decades of study &#8212; aka, trust me I am an expert.  That reason is not compelling, of course, except to corporatarians.</p>
<p>His other reason is that consolidated companies will do whatever it takes to get their hands on the levers of antitrust law, in its execution, and will use antitrust law to crush smaller competitors, turning this body of law 180 degrees away from its intended consequences, like Goliath doing courtroom and agency ju jitsu.  This argument of Friedman&#8217;s cannot be dismissed out of hand.</p>
<p>Returning to the Whole Foods proposed merger at hand, this could very well be a classic case of Whole Foods larger competitors using antitrust law to hurt Whole Foods and thereby help themselves.  If one agrees with this assessment, then there are  a couple possible reactions:</p>
<p>(i)  take this as yet another data point confirming Friedman&#8217;s late career condemnation of antitrust law; or</p>
<p>(ii) use this as an opportunity to spread the word about what is wrong with antitrust law so that new laws can be conceived and implemented to address the observed antitrust law problem with enthusiasm and in good faith.</p>
<p>My feelings are somewhat mixed, but I favor approach (ii) because I don&#8217;t think it has ever been tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobbo</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2508</link>
		<dc:creator>bobbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1844#comment-2508</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also here in Colorado, people have strong feelings about organic/natural food stores in general, and about which one they prefer&quot;

Maybe on the Front Range, but I&#039;ve never particularly noticed that on the Western Slope. &#039;Course, I can only think of one natural foods store in Grand Junction off of the top of my head.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also here in Colorado, people have strong feelings about organic/natural food stores in general, and about which one they prefer&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe on the Front Range, but I&#8217;ve never particularly noticed that on the Western Slope. &#8216;Course, I can only think of one natural foods store in Grand Junction off of the top of my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobbo</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2507</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1844#comment-2507</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also here in Colorado, people have strong feelings about organic/natural food stores in general, and about which one they prefer&quot;

Maybe on the Front Range, but I&#039;ve never particularly noticed that on the Western Slope. &#039;Course, I can only think of one natural foods store in Grand Junction off of the top of my head.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also here in Colorado, people have strong feelings about organic/natural food stores in general, and about which one they prefer&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe on the Front Range, but I&#8217;ve never particularly noticed that on the Western Slope. &#8216;Course, I can only think of one natural foods store in Grand Junction off of the top of my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thoreau</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2506</link>
		<dc:creator>thoreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 05:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1844#comment-2506</guid>
		<description>I mean price-wise, of course.  In terms of quality, Trader Joe&#039;s definitely has an edge over Safeway.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean price-wise, of course.  In terms of quality, Trader Joe&#8217;s definitely has an edge over Safeway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thoreau</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2505</link>
		<dc:creator>thoreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1844#comment-2505</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found that Trader Joe&#039;s is even competitive with Safeway on many items.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found that Trader Joe&#8217;s is even competitive with Safeway on many items.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcm</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2504</link>
		<dc:creator>mcm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1844#comment-2504</guid>
		<description>And likewise, here in Austin, home of WFM, we still have two Sun Harvest stores, which is the Texas chain owned by Wild Oats. But the difference in scale between them rather supports the anti-FTC case here. The Sun Harvest/WO stores are basically neighborhood grocers; the WFM stores (including the mega-flagship store downtown) are full-scale supermarkets, competing head-to-head with our big traditional supermarket chain (HEB, which has a high-end gourmet format called Central Market). People choose WFM over Sun Harvest because they want/need the bigger selection; they make the reverse choice because they want/need the low-hassle convenience of the corner market. The fact that both sell natural foods is incidental.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And likewise, here in Austin, home of WFM, we still have two Sun Harvest stores, which is the Texas chain owned by Wild Oats. But the difference in scale between them rather supports the anti-FTC case here. The Sun Harvest/WO stores are basically neighborhood grocers; the WFM stores (including the mega-flagship store downtown) are full-scale supermarkets, competing head-to-head with our big traditional supermarket chain (HEB, which has a high-end gourmet format called Central Market). People choose WFM over Sun Harvest because they want/need the bigger selection; they make the reverse choice because they want/need the low-hassle convenience of the corner market. The fact that both sell natural foods is incidental.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/06/06/but-its-an-organic-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2503</link>
		<dc:creator>LP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1844#comment-2503</guid>
		<description>Here in Boulder County, Wild Oats&#039; home base, just about every W.O. store is across the street or around the corner from a Whole Foods. Also here in Colorado, people have strong feelings about organic/natural food stores in general, and about which one they prefer, and seem to be more than willing to drive long distances to shop at whichever one they think is better. But probably this is a Boulder phenomenon, and not representative of the rest of the country, as usual. (Side note: Does the virtue of shopping at a natural foods store far away balance out the non-virtue of burning gas to get there, assuming many of these people aren&#039;t driving fully electric cars?)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here in Boulder County, Wild Oats&#8217; home base, just about every W.O. store is across the street or around the corner from a Whole Foods. Also here in Colorado, people have strong feelings about organic/natural food stores in general, and about which one they prefer, and seem to be more than willing to drive long distances to shop at whichever one they think is better. But probably this is a Boulder phenomenon, and not representative of the rest of the country, as usual. (Side note: Does the virtue of shopping at a natural foods store far away balance out the non-virtue of burning gas to get there, assuming many of these people aren&#8217;t driving fully electric cars?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

