<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life Unworthy of Life?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/05/23/life-unworthy-of-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/05/23/life-unworthy-of-life/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: asg</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/05/23/life-unworthy-of-life/comment-page-1/#comment-2312</link>
		<dc:creator>asg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 23:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1796#comment-2312</guid>
		<description>The Hymowitz link actually points to your GFR post.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hymowitz link actually points to your GFR post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin B. O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/05/23/life-unworthy-of-life/comment-page-1/#comment-2311</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin B. O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 19:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1796#comment-2311</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see why that conclusion would be problematic for Hymowitz. Just because one is pro-life, assuming she is, that doesn&#039;t mean you need to be in favor of every conception of life under every circumstance.

Folks who favor abstinence until marriage and at the same time oppose contraception are essentially in favor of a behavior pattern that will result in fewer children being born, right? Is that inconsistent with a pro-life POV? I don&#039;t think so.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see why that conclusion would be problematic for Hymowitz. Just because one is pro-life, assuming she is, that doesn&#8217;t mean you need to be in favor of every conception of life under every circumstance.</p>
<p>Folks who favor abstinence until marriage and at the same time oppose contraception are essentially in favor of a behavior pattern that will result in fewer children being born, right? Is that inconsistent with a pro-life POV? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

