<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strange Vindication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/04/23/strange-vindication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/04/23/strange-vindication/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:46:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/04/23/strange-vindication/comment-page-1/#comment-2079</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 23:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1745#comment-2079</guid>
		<description>I agree, I&#039;m in the same boat -- I was against the war, even though I believed 100% that Saddam had chemical weapons as well as the potential for nukes.  It was a bad idea anyway.

So then this also cuts the other direction.  Nearly all the Democrats who are now attacking the administration voted for the war too.  And as you point out, there were lots of people who were against it even accepting Bush&#039;s WMD lies.  So they can&#039;t claim they were tricked into it, and the truth is revealed that they were for it while it seemed like it would be successful, and against it when it wasn&#039;t.

So we get all of them lumped into two categories: hypocritical partisan or honestly incompetent.  (I&#039;m quite sure both parties qualify both labels, though)  I, for one, am shocked by this unexpected revelation!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, I&#8217;m in the same boat &#8212; I was against the war, even though I believed 100% that Saddam had chemical weapons as well as the potential for nukes.  It was a bad idea anyway.</p>
<p>So then this also cuts the other direction.  Nearly all the Democrats who are now attacking the administration voted for the war too.  And as you point out, there were lots of people who were against it even accepting Bush&#8217;s WMD lies.  So they can&#8217;t claim they were tricked into it, and the truth is revealed that they were for it while it seemed like it would be successful, and against it when it wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>So we get all of them lumped into two categories: hypocritical partisan or honestly incompetent.  (I&#8217;m quite sure both parties qualify both labels, though)  I, for one, am shocked by this unexpected revelation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
