<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Favorite Object</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/03/14/new-favorite-object/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/03/14/new-favorite-object/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:46:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anthony C</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/03/14/new-favorite-object/comment-page-1/#comment-1791</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1665#comment-1791</guid>
		<description>Incidentally, I&#039;m fascinated by the inclusion of Bernard Williams&#039; book on opera in your sidebar (and also The Hustle - didn&#039;t know that got and circulation outside of the UK). Is the big draw there the opera or the author?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, I&#8217;m fascinated by the inclusion of Bernard Williams&#8217; book on opera in your sidebar (and also The Hustle &#8211; didn&#8217;t know that got and circulation outside of the UK). Is the big draw there the opera or the author?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony C</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/03/14/new-favorite-object/comment-page-1/#comment-1790</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1665#comment-1790</guid>
		<description>I see - I suppose that&#039;s a shame, I was all set to recommend Nick Basbanes&#039; books as a possible avenue of exploration (specially his latest on the historical impact of various books). But hey, it&#039;s far better that you don&#039;t go the full blown bibliophile route. I&#039;m pretty well on the way to calling my books my &quot;children&quot;. It&#039;s not pretty. If I end my days with my feet protruding from beneath an overturned bookcase, Wicked Witch of the East stylee, I don&#039;t think it&#039;ll come as a big surprise to anyone.

All that said, I increasingly find it the case that being in an occupation that involves reading enormous amounts of non-fiction written material all day, my tolerance for serious fiction is far lower than it used to be. I find myself not reading fiction for long periods and then going through a werewolf-like periodic frenzy in which I end up ploughing through mindless pap with serious gusto. But that&#039;s probably what comes from an education that largely involves reading Clausewitz and writing about the missile gap and naval strategy in the Baltic.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see &#8211; I suppose that&#8217;s a shame, I was all set to recommend Nick Basbanes&#8217; books as a possible avenue of exploration (specially his latest on the historical impact of various books). But hey, it&#8217;s far better that you don&#8217;t go the full blown bibliophile route. I&#8217;m pretty well on the way to calling my books my &#8220;children&#8221;. It&#8217;s not pretty. If I end my days with my feet protruding from beneath an overturned bookcase, Wicked Witch of the East stylee, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;ll come as a big surprise to anyone.</p>
<p>All that said, I increasingly find it the case that being in an occupation that involves reading enormous amounts of non-fiction written material all day, my tolerance for serious fiction is far lower than it used to be. I find myself not reading fiction for long periods and then going through a werewolf-like periodic frenzy in which I end up ploughing through mindless pap with serious gusto. But that&#8217;s probably what comes from an education that largely involves reading Clausewitz and writing about the missile gap and naval strategy in the Baltic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Sanchez</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/03/14/new-favorite-object/comment-page-1/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Sanchez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1665#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s that I have any special fondness for books about books, as such... but I guess to properly identify with the protagonist, it probably helps if you&#039;re the kind of person who can empathize with being as consumed with a novel or author as he becomes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s that I have any special fondness for books about books, as such&#8230; but I guess to properly identify with the protagonist, it probably helps if you&#8217;re the kind of person who can empathize with being as consumed with a novel or author as he becomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony C</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/03/14/new-favorite-object/comment-page-1/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1665#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>Although presumably the book stands on its own merits (I&#039;ve been meaning to pick up a copy for a while but somehow haven&#039;t yet got round to it), do you have bibliophilic leanings that particularly drew you to it? It seems to me that there&#039;s a definite constituency that gets a particular thrill out of books about books.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although presumably the book stands on its own merits (I&#8217;ve been meaning to pick up a copy for a while but somehow haven&#8217;t yet got round to it), do you have bibliophilic leanings that particularly drew you to it? It seems to me that there&#8217;s a definite constituency that gets a particular thrill out of books about books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/03/14/new-favorite-object/comment-page-1/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>LP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1665#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>I myself am a fan of &#039;superfluous longhand writing.&#039; Reasons: Writing with high-quality ink on fine, ideally old, paper provides a unique sensuous (and sensual) pleasure, akin to listening to a dusty vinyl record over HD audio equipment, or using a very sharp knife to cut mushrooms. Plus, writing or drawing loops and looped figures lowers blood pressure and reduces neural overstimulation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself am a fan of &#8217;superfluous longhand writing.&#8217; Reasons: Writing with high-quality ink on fine, ideally old, paper provides a unique sensuous (and sensual) pleasure, akin to listening to a dusty vinyl record over HD audio equipment, or using a very sharp knife to cut mushrooms. Plus, writing or drawing loops and looped figures lowers blood pressure and reduces neural overstimulation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
