<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Very Unique Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/01/03/a-very-unique-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/01/03/a-very-unique-post/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LowLife</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/01/03/a-very-unique-post/comment-page-1/#comment-1455</link>
		<dc:creator>LowLife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 18:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1505#comment-1455</guid>
		<description>You have probably heard most of his material before.  But I think Carlin&#039;s stuff is more effective on the young since his type of language and behavior observations will tend to seem new to them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have probably heard most of his material before.  But I think Carlin&#8217;s stuff is more effective on the young since his type of language and behavior observations will tend to seem new to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/01/03/a-very-unique-post/comment-page-1/#comment-1454</link>
		<dc:creator>LP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1505#comment-1454</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s tempting to me to stick with the sticlers on this one, because etyologically the word really does mean, literally, &#039;the only one (of its kind)&#039;. But on the other hand, on this definition, which is basically just a statement of non-identity with any other thing in the universe, &#039;unique&#039; is a boring and useless descriptor, since it doesn&#039;t tell us anything new about whatever&#039;s being described. So on this one occasion, I can support throwing out the etymologically valid meaning and adopting a new one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s tempting to me to stick with the sticlers on this one, because etyologically the word really does mean, literally, &#8216;the only one (of its kind)&#8217;. But on the other hand, on this definition, which is basically just a statement of non-identity with any other thing in the universe, &#8216;unique&#8217; is a boring and useless descriptor, since it doesn&#8217;t tell us anything new about whatever&#8217;s being described. So on this one occasion, I can support throwing out the etymologically valid meaning and adopting a new one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sommer</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2007/01/03/a-very-unique-post/comment-page-1/#comment-1453</link>
		<dc:creator>Sommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1505#comment-1453</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m pretty sure Carlin was just funnier when he was still on drugs. Much like Robin Williams. Though Carlin still pulls out a few aces (he had an HBO special maybe 5 years ago that wasn&#039;t bad), unlike Williams.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure Carlin was just funnier when he was still on drugs. Much like Robin Williams. Though Carlin still pulls out a few aces (he had an HBO special maybe 5 years ago that wasn&#8217;t bad), unlike Williams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

