<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EveryRing Bad Is Good for You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.juliansanchez.com/2005/06/08/everyring-bad-is-good-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2005/06/08/everyring-bad-is-good-for-you/</link>
	<description>Just another geek in the geek kingdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:38:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2005/06/08/everyring-bad-is-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1049#comment-593</guid>
		<description>EBIGfY was someone writing a comprehensive and literate explanation of something that I&#039;ve believed (alone, I thought) for a long time.

I think it definitely applies to old art.  Shakespeare definitely understood the line between retread low-comedy trash (Merry Wives of Windsor) and &quot;complex&quot; (in the EBIGfY definition) stuff that became more fascinating every time you read it -- and allows readers to find new facets even 400 years later.

Which is exactly why Wagner and Shakespeare are still studied today, while their run of the mill contemporary competitors are forgotten.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EBIGfY was someone writing a comprehensive and literate explanation of something that I&#8217;ve believed (alone, I thought) for a long time.</p>
<p>I think it definitely applies to old art.  Shakespeare definitely understood the line between retread low-comedy trash (Merry Wives of Windsor) and &#8220;complex&#8221; (in the EBIGfY definition) stuff that became more fascinating every time you read it &#8212; and allows readers to find new facets even 400 years later.</p>
<p>Which is exactly why Wagner and Shakespeare are still studied today, while their run of the mill contemporary competitors are forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davei</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2005/06/08/everyring-bad-is-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Davei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2005 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1049#comment-592</guid>
		<description>Andrew Porter&#039;s translations helped me a lot.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew Porter&#8217;s translations helped me a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuckalicious</title>
		<link>http://www.juliansanchez.com/2005/06/08/everyring-bad-is-good-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuckalicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 22:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://juliansanchez.com/?p=1049#comment-591</guid>
		<description>Patri Friedman made a substantively similar point three days after the third anniversary of 9/11.  See here

http://catallarchy.net/blog/archives/2004/09/14/psychological-impact-of-a-large-well-connected-recorded-world/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patri Friedman made a substantively similar point three days after the third anniversary of 9/11.  See here</p>
<p><a href="http://catallarchy.net/blog/archives/2004/09/14/psychological-impact-of-a-large-well-connected-recorded-world/" rel="nofollow">http://catallarchy.net/blog/archives/2004/09/14/psychological-impact-of-a-large-well-connected-recorded-world/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

