Pugnacious halfwit Bill O’Reilly loves dishing out the verbal lashings on the parade of banalities he calls a cable show, but apparently, a little criticism that’s not on turf he controls is a bit too much for Bill to handle. Fox has sent this legal nastygram to an anti-Bill website called O’Reilly-Sucks. The letter accuses […]

[Read more →]

If Cardinal Bloomberg has his way, you will no longer be able to smoke a cigarette in a New York City bar. Let me repeat that. You will not. Be able. To smoke a cigarette. In New York City. In a fucking bar. I’m waiting to hear that you can only drink milk and cookies […]

[Read more →]

It’s over; we’ve won. You can sell off your collection of Milton Friedman hardbacks, tape over your Stossel videos, and stop wasting your time reading rants like this one. You see, the world is now in the iron grip of a quasi-religious cult, a fanatical cabal with global influence, which has brought about a laissez-faire […]

[Read more →]

Eve has a good response-to-my-response-to-her-response, to which Sara has, for the moment, deferred. Lest this become AbortionBlog, I’ll try to keep my remarks succinct. Before diving into the point-by-point, though, let me just clarify what I meant when I said that the link between human biology and value depended on that biology typically giving rise […]

[Read more →]

I’ve spent the last couple of days at work researching the San Fernando Valley’s push to secede from the city of Los Angeles, which will be put to a vote in November. Believe it or not, this actually allowed me to blogcrawl a bit: one of the most useful resources I found was the witty, […]

[Read more →]

Lemme take a break from all that brow-furrowing to relate something I heard on the local NPR affiliate this morning. The announcer informed all those potential corporate donors out there in radioland that underwriting spots on NPR “get results.” Results? (I asked, in my best Polyanna falsetto) What on earth could those results possibly be? […]

[Read more →]

Both Sara and the redoubtable Eve Tushnet flatter me with responses to the previous post. I hope neither will object to a combined response-to-the-responses. I’ll note by way of preface Sara’s reference to Stanley Fish, who observes that pro-choice folks now seem to focus on metaphysical questions, and a distinction between “biological” and “moral” life, […]

[Read more →]

Fellow Koch alum Sara Russo has posted a transcript of a speech she delivered at a conservative conference, entitled “The Science of Being Pro-Life.” She begins with the observation that many people are, rightly enough, not impressed with strictly religious arguments against abortion. Few people, after all, think that we should criminalize the failure to […]

[Read more →]

Sep Dog throws out two questions on his blog today: why is speech that causes disutility morally distinct from actions that do the same, and what’s so bad about the Digital Millennium Copyright Act? First, speech: I don’t know that I’d make “disutitlity” the primary focus in either case, but that’s a longer discussion than […]

[Read more →]

Ram over at PostPolitics dug into Dick Gephardt’s funding and found that his special brand of anti-corporate populism is, unsurprisingly enough, funded by huge corporations. Now, maybe that’s just self-defense, because as an incumbent Gephardt is practically guaranteed reelection. But Ram suggests that the motivation may be more sinister still: as long as regulation and […]

[Read more →]